Sunday, January 10, 2010

This letter I sent to Jon Kyl


Dear Mr. Jon Kyl

I am a concerned American citizen
My wife and I are indeed very concerned about our country as a whole, its economy, jobs, immigration reform, home security, and much much more.
We feel as if President Obama and Janet Napolitano aren’t doing their jobs correctly in this liberal run Government. Something has to be done, and done soon.

We do not want illegal’s getting citizenship; it isn’t fair at all to those who do come here the legal way. It isn’t right for the liberals to just giveaway our countries citizenship.
We also want G I T M O kept open, For God’s sake. Do not bring these Islamic terrorists into our United States. Period

Also why is it that these Government Liberals such as Pelosi and Reid do not have to go by OUR US Constitution?
They took an oath to protect and serve.. End of story
Also what happened to the Tax payer’s stimulus monies?
Where are all the jobs Obama promised?
We also do not want a Cap and Tax program in our country.
For God sake why would Obama want our energy bills to go up? We can barely afford what we have right now.
We also want Tariffs on Imported vehicles weather they are assembled here or not.
We insist on Fair trade instead of FREE trade.
We insist that our Government lower the industry tax so American business can once again prosper in our country…Period!
We do not want terrorist tried in Public Courts, We insist on Military Courts!
Right now OUR country seems weak and lazy, I want our country to be a strong country, I am sick and tired of Apology tour 2009 all over again, We are sick and tired of Pelosi calling We the People of this United States the terrorists.
Please Mr. Kyl rally you’re troops in Washington

Sincerely Yours Vance Phoenix AZ

I make a suggestion to all to do the same
it is the only way for Americans to take their country back

Friday, January 8, 2010

The Progressive Movement

Woodrow Wilson like Obama

"Woodrow Wilson"
Wilson was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in late 1920 for his services in the previous year. However, his brief retirement in Washington was unhappy; the ill and embittered former president lived out his days in virtual seclusion.

After the armistice in November 1918, Wilson decided to head the American peace delegation personally, hoping to assure the implementation of his conception of the postwar world. Despite being received with great adulation by the public in Europe, the president was soon confronted by Allied leaders who preferred that the peace process be a means to incapacitate the German war machine for generations to come. Dubbed derisively as “the drum major of civilization,” the idealistic president was forced in the end to approve compromises in order to achieve his top priority, the League of Nations, included in the Treaty of Versailles. Which is know as the U N today.

An exhausted Wilson returned to the United States, where opposition to the treaty and League was gaining strength. In typical fashion, he took his appeal directly to the public on a railroad speaking tour through the Midwest and West. In late September Wilson collapsed and was taken back to Washington, where he suffered a stroke on October 2. He was partially paralyzed and was incapable of spearheading the fight for the League; the Senate defeated proposals late in 1919 and again in the spring of 1920.
Rather than accept compromise, Wilson chose to take the treaty to the electorate by publishing entreaties on its behalf, believing that a Democratic triumph in the Election of 1920 would force the Senate to see things his way. His call for a “solemn referendum” was not heeded by the voters, who handed Warren Harding and the Republicans a smashing victory.

Just like what is going to happen again in 2010 and 2012
General Interest, 1924
Certainly the most successful third party in the immediate post-World War I era was the Progressive effort led by Senator Robert M. La Follette of Wisconsin. The end of the war had seen an upsurge in left-wing political activity in the United States, as evidenced in the growth and development of the Workers’ Party (the Communists), the Socialist Party and the Farmer-Labor Party, all of which increased their ranks at the beginning of the 1920s.

Today this would be ECIU and Acorn

Urban problems were addressed by professional social workers who operated settlement houses as a means to protect and improve the prospects of the poor. However, efforts to place limitations on child labor were routinely thwarted by the courts. The needs of blacks and Native Americans were poorly served or served not at all — a major shortcoming of the Progressive Movement. Hence Van Jones! “No more broken treaties”
Hillary Clinton doesn't want to be called a Liberal she prefers to be called a “Progressive”
Gee I wonder why
Henry Agaard Wallace
One of Wallace's immediate tasks was to reduce the grain surplus. Wallace, along with Assistant Secretary of Agriculture Rexford Tugwell and others, authored the first major New Deal agricultural legislation, the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933. That radical legislation, later found unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court, had the goal to "relieve the existing national economic emergency by increasing agricultural purchasing power." Local boards consisting of farmers were established to determine the production of farm commodities in their own communities. Unfortunately, by the time the act was passed, farmers had already planted their crops. Making one of the most difficult decisions of his life, Wallace ordered the destruction of six million hogs and 10 million acres of cotton in an effort to bring the surpluses down.
The Court struck down the act in 1936 because farming was not considered to be interstate commerce and therefore could not be regulated by the federal government. Years later Wallace would see the AAA as one of his crowning achievements.
You see radicals aren't good for this country.
Eventually, Wallace's relationship with Truman deteriorated completely and on September 20, 1946, the president removed him from his cabinet post. Wallace then assumed the Progressive Party leadership and became its candidate for president in 1948. In a four-way race, Truman carried the election, and Wallace placed a distant fourth.
You see the same thing is happening today, Only its Global Warming and Cap and Tax, and tax payer paid health care. And soon it will be illegals being able to vote!

Progressivism is a political and social term for ideologies and movements favoring or advocating changes or reform, usually in an egalitarian direction for economic policies (public management) and liberal direction for social policies. Progressivism is often viewed in opposition to conservative ideologies.
This in the end is never good for a free country!
Presidential leadership would provide the unity of direction--the vision--needed for true progressive government. "All that progressives ask or desire," wrote Woodrow Wilson, "is permission--in an era when development, evolution, is a scientific word--to interpret the Constitution according to the Darwinian principle

interpret the Constitution

interpret the Constitution ? Excuse me!

The Founders believed that all men are created equal and that they have certain inalienable rights. All are also obliged to obey the natural law, under which we have not only rights but duties. We are obliged "to respect those rights in others which we value in ourselves" (Jefferson). The main rights were thought to be life and liberty, including the liberty to organize one's own church, to associate at work or at home with whomever one pleases, and to use one's talents to acquire and keep property. For the Founders, then, there is a natural moral order--rules discovered by human reason that promote human well-being, rules that can and should guide human life and politics.
The Progressives rejected these claims as naive and unhistorical. In their view, human beings are not born free. John Dewey, the most thoughtful of the Progressives, wrote that freedom is not "something that individuals have as a ready-made possession." It is "something to be achieved." In this view, freedom is not a gift of God or nature. It is a product of human making, a gift of the state. Man is a product of his own history, through which he collectively creates himself. He is a social construct. Since human beings are not naturally free, there can be no natural rights or natural law. Therefore, Dewey also writes, "Natural rights and natural liberties exist only in the kingdom of mythological social zoology."
Since the Progressives held that nature gives man little or nothing and that everything of value to human life is made by man, they concluded that there are no permanent standards of right. Dewey spoke of "historical relativity." However, in one sense, the Progressives did believe that human beings are oriented toward freedom, not by nature (which, as the merely primitive, contains nothing human), but by the historical process, which has the character of progressing toward increasing freedom. So the "relativity" in question means that in all times, people have views of right and wrong that are tied to their particular times, but in our time, the views of the most enlightened are true because they are in conformity with where history is going.

For the Founders, then, the individuals existence and freedom in this crucial respect are not a gift of government. They are a gift of God and nature. Government is therefore always and fundamentally in the service of the individual, not the other way around. The purpose of government, then, is to enforce the natural law for the members of the political community by securing the people's natural rights. It does so by preserving their lives and liberties against the violence of others. In the founding, the liberty to be secured by government is not freedom from necessity or poverty. It is freedom from the despotic and predatory domination of some human beings over others.
Government's main duty for the Founders is to secure that freedom--at home through the making and enforcement of criminal and civil law, abroad through a strong national defense. The protection of life and liberty is achieved through vigorous prosecutions of crime against person and property or through civil suits for recovery of damages, these cases being decided by a jury of one's peers.
The Progressives regarded the Founders' scheme as defective because it took too benign a view of nature. As Dewey remarked, they thought that the individual was ready-made by nature. The Founders' supposed failure to recognize the crucial role of society led the Progressives to disparage the Founders' insistence on limited government. The Progressive goal of politics is freedom, now understood as freedom from the limits imposed by nature and necessity. They rejected the Founders' conception of freedom as useful for self-preservation for the sake of the individual pursuit of happiness. For the Progressives, freedom is redefined as the fulfillment of human capacities, which becomes the primary task of the state.

These liberals or so called Progressives MUST be put out Period!!!!!!!!

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Bring it to the table America

Why Do Liberals Hate Guns? And Americans

1. Liberal Democrats Hate Gun Owners
Gun owners, as a general rule, are more conservative and are more likely to vote Republican. Gun owners are also more likely to join the Armed forces and to give unqualified support to our troops. Gun owners are also more likely to think it was a good idea for people like Richard Nixon to go after communists like Alger Hiss. Many gun owners supported the Vietnam War. Some of them allowed themselves to be drafted and others went so far as to enlist of their own accord. These, however, are all things that liberal Democrats despise. If gun owners are in favor of these hated things, guns must be very bad.
2. Gun Control as a Means to Attain Political Power
Many misguided people have an honest aversion to guns and would prefer the enactment of strict gun control regulations. In this great country they are entitled to their opinion and to vote their beliefs. The liberal Democrats know this and use these people as a means to win elections.
The liberal Democrats are actually an unholy alliance of single issue voting blocs. The liberal Democrats believe that they can win at the ballot box if they support the following issues and groups: abortion, homosexuality, affirmative action, opposition to school vouchers, anti-religious sentiment, radical feminists and big labor unions.
Gun control is just another special interest in their bag of tricks. The best example of this is the assault weapons ban. Every rational person knows that the ban eliminates certain guns based on cosmetic features. Bayonet lugs and flash suppressors do not make semi-automatic guns more deadly or more suitable for criminal use! However, the assault weapon ban is the ideal wedge to use in a heated political debate. ("My Republican and Libertarian friends are against the assault weapons ban!")

Liberal Democrats Hate the Constitution
The Constitution protects the individual rights of individuals and it protects individuals from the State. Liberal Democrats hate this. They believe that they know what's good for us, how to use our money better than we do, and they know whether I should be allowed to carry a gun on my person to protect myself, my family and my Synagogue. How else do you explain that liberal Democrats find a right to abortion emanating from the penumbra of the Constitution, but cannot seem to find any individual right at all in the Second Amendment?
Democrats know that when someone commits a crime, it is society that has failed and should have to pay -- in the form of higher taxes and reduced freedom.
Republicans believe that every person inherently knows right from wrong, whether they were raised by harlot on the mean streets of East St. Louis or by a wealthy Episcopal minister in the ritzy 'burbs of Germantown. They know that the solution to violent crime is to beat the hell out of the perpetrators.
Democrats consider any form of smoking of tobacco that is produced by the large corporations to be evil. The only material acceptable for smoking is marijuana or Native American ritual tobacco. If you are invited to the home of one of your cool friends and are handed a joint, do not think you have to eat it just because there is a sign on the wall that says, "Thank you for not Smoking".
Republicans think smoking is fine as long as it provides the opportunity to ship large quantities of money to the subsidized tobacco farmers and producers. Of course the smoking of any "controlled substance" is not permitted even if tobacco kills far more people. Because, it is the law, you idiot. Republicans are for law and order. Lots of both.
Democrats believe in the concept of "equal distribution of wealth" even if they happened to be hoarding quite a pile of it. They justify this by the fact that to do their job requires that they live in a certain high class style that allows them to associate with the influential.
Republicans believe that hard work and the economic "invisible hand" will make sure that anyone who deserves it gets it or the reverse as the case may be. By definition, if you are broke and living off the street, you deserve it.

The left wing of our country seems to believe that they can push anything that they want onto the American people.
Such as having illegals being able to vote and have free tax payer paid health care, they will soon find out that they will have less power after the 2010 and 2012 elections, we the people of America have simply had enough of these Keith Olbermann adoring idiots.
Obama will lose power in the senate, because the libtards will no longer have the majority, even people that do usually vote demotard will vote for a republican Just to be able to say goodbye libtards.
The great and true people of this country see the path of poison Embedded Socialism that they are trying to deal us.
They will learn quickly that we the people are against this.
We also see that these socialists are completely un constitutional.
Hence Nancy Pelosi replying to a reporter that asked her what part of the US Constitution she was going by to pass health care and she answered “Are you serious”
YES Nancy we are indeed serious!
And then you have all this Global Warming BS.
Has anyone noticed the stunningly Cold winter this country is having? Liberals will factually believe anything they are told by other liberals.
Like by having terrorists on trial in a criminal court will make us safer...This is indeed a huge load of liberal crap.
That like saying that electric vehicles are clean..YEA W R I G HT!!
Guess what, You are charging them with electricity from a coal fired power plant..Cleaner my A**.
These are the very same liberals who shipped jobs overseas and closed tobacco farmers down and put thousands out of work.
These are the same libtards that put Van Jones a communist in the Wright House, These are the same liberals that shut down hundreds of American farmers in California.
These are the same idiots that drive up the price of food in America all the while giving welfare recipients more.
You will see more Tea Parties in 2012 and thank God for that.
We the people need to push back the Far Left agenda.
Please note Glenn Becks “RED” phone hasn't rung as yet, This means only one thing America,“He Glenn Beck isn't wrong”

Friday, January 1, 2010

OH Bama can't STOP the TEA Parties

America's anger is building Liberalism = "Redistribution of Wealth"

We the People of the United States of America are truly fed up and it shows.

Tea Party Patriots as an organization believes in the Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government, and Free Markets. Tea Party Patriots, Inc. is a non-partisan grassroots organization of individuals united by our core values derived from the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States of America, the Bill Of Rights as explained in the Federalist Papers. We recognize and support the strength of grassroots organization powered by activism and civic responsibility at a local level. We hold that the United States is a republic conceived by its architects as a nation whose people were granted "unalienable rights" by our Creator. Chiefly among these are the rights to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." The Tea Party Patriots stand with our founders, as heirs to the republic, to claim our rights and duties which preserve their legacy and our own. We hold, as did the founders, that there exists an inherent benefit to our country when private property and prosperity are secured by natural law and the rights of the individual.

These liberals seem to think that America's Tea Parties are a JOKE but that is called a Distraction, from the real truth
We the true and real people of this Country are taking back what’s ours, Life , Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness back, That is indeed the real story here.

Liberalism = "Redistribution of Wealth"
Liberalism = the new socialist communist party
Liberalism = Mr. Oh Boma’s party of Fairness
People such as Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid believe that they can just push us Americans around, however they will find out when it comes time for our country to vote how wrong they truly are in this matter.

These liberal democrats want to push this country to its breaking point.
With huge deficits’ and Not fighting Terrorism they way that it should be fought.
Handing out taxpayer paid healthcare to all like its candy
They will have amnesty programs for illegals so they can proclaim the free taxpayer paid healthcare, the liberals need this amnesty to pass so they can have 13 million new democrat voters come 2012. America must fight and fight with all your might to beat the libtards at there same old game. Tax payer paid handouts must stop; they are taking this country down into the deep dark ibis of hell. Thomas Jefferson once stated “A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference”
And “A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine”
And also “Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom”

Our President Oh, Bama has shown Zero integrity or honor, But yet he accepted the Nobel Peace Prize, Come on Mr. President are you kidding me?

Liberals want to make the USA Tea Parties seem small and make the people appear stupid but that is just what they do, belittle people. It’s their nature.
In turn the reason America is in such poor shape right now is because of them.
Barney Frank and Chris Dodd fought to have poor people be able to purchase homes that they couldn’t afford “Hence” A C O R N !!

We need to audit the Fed for certain; they need to be held accountable… Period
The people whom voted for C H A N G E surely did not get it.
A democrat President isn’t going to allow for the FED to become audited.. end of story.

It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.
Thomas Jefferson

Where are the NEW Founder's for this country?
Illegal immigration is a genuinely national issue, and resolving it requires a national commitment not just on health care but also border control, law enforcement and other resources.
Jon Kyl
Real leadership means tackling tough problems ourselves and not leaving them to our children.
Jon Kyl

We need more people willing to step up to the plate and take charge!!!!!!!!

Thanks Vance Keaton
Phoenix AZ

Happy 2010